Two of OpenAI's most capable production models — GPT-4.1 and GPT-4o — are both available in AACFlow's Agent block. They're priced similarly, but they're not interchangeable. Choosing the wrong one for your workflow type can cost you in latency, accuracy, and dollars.
Here is a straightforward breakdown of when to use each.
What makes GPT-4.1 different from GPT-4o?
GPT-4.1 was released with a focus on instruction-following precision and coding performance. It accepts up to 1 million tokens of context — the largest context window of any generally available OpenAI model. That means you can pass an entire codebase, a multi-hundred-page document, or months of conversation history without truncation.
GPT-4o is OpenAI's multimodal flagship. It processes text, images, audio, and structured data in a single unified model. Its context window is 128k tokens, which covers the vast majority of production use cases. GPT-4o was optimized for speed and versatility, not raw instruction-following depth.
How do the prices compare?
Both models are priced close to each other, but there are meaningful differences:
| Model | Input | Output | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4.1 | $2.00 / 1M tokens | $8.00 / 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| GPT-4o | $2.50 / 1M tokens | $10.00 / 1M tokens | 128k tokens |
GPT-4.1 is cheaper per token. For text-heavy workflows with long inputs, GPT-4.1 reduces your cost by roughly 20% on inputs and 20% on outputs while giving you an 8x larger context window. That is a significant advantage for pipelines that process large documents or maintain long-running agent memory.



